Judge Refuses To Hear Evidence Of Muslim In Veil

When a woman refused to remove her veil for Judge Audrey Balla, the irate magistrate decided that two can play at that game.

An entitled Muslim woman, who is one of two wives of a convicted terrorist, brought a discrimination and assault case against a police officer before the court. However, after the belligerent woman refused to remove her veil for the female judge, the fed-up magistrate finally announced that she was going to deny the stubborn Muslim woman something as well.

In Western countries, you’ll find very quickly that if you refuse to follow a judge’s order, you’re in contempt of court. If you’re lucky, the judge won’t order your incarceration. However, Muslims rarely experience this type of justice. For fear of being accused of racism, even judges are hesitant to force Muslims in their court to adhere to the rules like everyone else. In the case of one Muslim woman, however, she discovered that everyone has their limits.

After authorities raided the house of now-convicted terrorist Hamdi Alqudsi, one of his wive’s decided to sue the police, claiming they punched her in the face and cursed at her during Operation Appleby on September 18, 2014. Hoping to get back at law enforcement for catching her jihadist husband, Moutia Elzahed, Alqudsi, and their sons demanded compensation for alleged “assault and battery, wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, and intimidation,” the Daily Telegraph reports.

Willing to hear Elzahed’s case, Australian Judge Audrey Balla told the woman to remove her burqa so that she could identify her and read her facial expressions during the hearing. As expected, Elzahed refused, citing religious purposes. Agreeing to give her special privilege, Balla agreed to close the court while she gave her testimony. This time, Elzahed not only turned down the generous deal but wouldn’t stand when the judge entered and exited the court. In what is considered to be a first in Australia, Judge Balla ultimately announced that since Elzahed refused to remove her veil, she would refuse to hear her evidence against the arresting officers.

Entitled Muslim Refuses To Remove Veil, Irate Judge Denies HER Something
Moutia Elzahed wouldn’t remove her face veil, so Judge Balla wouldn’t accept her evidence in the case.

Upholding Sharia over Australian law and probably realizing that she won’t win anyway, Elzahed not only refused to take off the niqab the third time, she didn’t even show up on the fourth day of her hearing. Of course, the Muslim supremacist is now whining that “it is not fair” that she couldn’t present her evidence against the officers.

 When participating in a jury trial, jury members are instructed by court officials to read the facial expressions and body language of the accused when determining their judgment. This is impossible if they can’t even see the defendant.

“I must take into account whether I would be impeded in my ability to fully assess the reliability and credibility of the evidence of the first plaintiff if I am not afforded the opportunity of being able to see her face when she gives evidence,” Judge Balla explained. “However, neither of those considerations can, in my view, mean that I should be completely deprived of having the assistance of seeing her face to assess her credibility.”

Moutia Elzahed was told that since she wouldn't remove her face veil, Judge Balla wouldn't accept her evidence for the case.
Although Elzahed’s husband Hamdi Alqudsi is a convicted terrorist, she still feels that her family was abused by the arresting officers.

Proving leftists are willing to forego logic to appease the world’s most intolerant religion, Elzahed’s male lawyer says that he respects her decision to never show him her face. In short, he admits that even he doesn’t know the person he’s representing.

“I’m instructed that she’s of the Muslim religion and it’s against her religion to reveal her face to men, although not to women,” said Clive Evatt, Elzahed’s attorney. “Therefore, I’m instructed she will not remove her veil, if that’s the correct expression, or whatever it is.”

According to Express, New South Wales police agreed with Balla, stating that Elzahed’s facial expressions are a “very important part of giving evidence.” Understandably, the accused officers don’t want Elzahed to have an unfair advantage of lying by hiding any tell-tale expressions that might tip off the judge.

Still, Elzahed and her polygamist husband’s sons are playing the victim card, claiming that the police actually “wanted to see her naked,” which in this case might just be a referral to her face.

“She was holding the blanket above her body because she was – like, she wasn’t really clothed. Once she refused to take the blanket off for the man that came in at the beginning of the raid, he punched her,” said Abdullah George, Elzahed’s 17-year-old son. “My mum said that they wanted to see her naked, and that she was holding the blanket so that they wouldn’t remove it and she also said that they broke the door, and that she asked why. She says, ‘why did they break the door?’”

Muslims claim that Islam isn’t just a religion of peace, it’s the one and only religion of peace. Of course, they do this while demanding that we conform to their religious beliefs. Hopefully, more countries are beginning to wake up to the fact that Muslims aren’t here to assimilate or even coexist but to “fight until there is no more disbelief and the religion, all of it, is for Allah,” just as the Quran commands.

AGREE OR DISAGREE ? 

 

10 Shares
Share2
+12
Tweet3
Share3
Stumble